Ethics Application - Clinical Trials and Research

Early Phase Trials

A scientific expert review toolkit has been developed for Investigators, sponsors, scientific expert reviewers and HRECs to support safety in early phase clinical trials for Victorian participants. Guidance on the Scientific Expert Review Toolkit is now available.

Scientific expert review proformas to assist in the assessment of an early phase clinical trial research application can be accessed by ethics committees/research offices by contacting the Coordinating Office at multisite.ethics@safercare.vic.gov.au

How to make an Ethics Application

To prepare an ethics application the following considerations need to be made. Before you start your application be sure to know the HREC you will submit to. For multisite trials and research the Submission Closing Date for the reviewing ethics committee meeting is accessible here.

Role and responsibilities for Investigators conducting single and multi-site research

For a single-site project, the Principal Investigator (PI) has overall responsibility for the ethics application and conduct of the research project.

For a multi-site project, the Coordinating Principal Investigator (CPI) has overall responsibility for the ethics application and conduct of the research project. Each site has its own Principal Investigator (PI) who is responsible for the site’s research governance/SSA application and conduct of the research project at that site.

The responsibilities of the CPI, PI and sponsor are summarised in the Roles and Responsibilities in a Research Project document.

Ethics Checklist

The Ethics Checklist assists the Coordinating Principal Investigator (CPI) or Principal Investigator (PI) to prepare the ethics application. The CPI or PI may submit the Ethics Checklist when submitting the ethics application in ERM.

The ERM website is used to create an ethics application and submit to a Victorian ethics committee (HREC).

Note advice on acceptance of electronic signatures using the ERM system can be found in the Help area of ERM and in ERM Training Tools.

Create a HREC application

The Human Research Ethics Application (HREA) form is an ethics application form developed by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). The HREA replaced the National Ethics Application Form (NEAF) in August 2017.

The HREA is used for an ethics application to a Victorian HREC at a public health organisation and must have the Victorian Specific Module attached to the application to address Victorian legislation, as the HREA is a national form.

The Victorian Low and Negligible Risk (LNR) VIC form has been renamed to the Victorian Low Risk Form (Low Risk VIC) to align with the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research 2023 (Chapter 2.1 and Chapter 5.1) regarding low risk research projects at health organisations.

The Victorian Low Risk Form (Low Risk VIC) can be used for single-site low risk research projects in Victoria only. This form is not for ethics review. Before completing the Low Risk VIC Form, consult with the reviewing organisation’s research office on the non-HREC review pathway for the project. Some reviewing organisations may not accept the Low Risk VIC Form.

The Victorian Low Risk Form (Low Risk VIC) is available for completion on the ERM website.

The Minimal Dataset Form (MDF) is used when an ethics application is reviewed under National Mutual Acceptance by a jurisdiction outside Victoria and Queensland. A MDF is created once only for a research project.

All HREC applications are created on the ERM website. See the ERM Guidance section for detailed instructions on how to create an HREC application.

Complete a HREC application

All applications must be completed on the ERM website, and all supporting documents uploaded.

Victorian specific module

The Victorian Specific Module (VSM) is mandatory when the HREA is used. It must be uploaded as a supporting document and submitted as part of the ethics application.

The Victorian specific module has been designed so that the HREC can address legislative requirements.

In Victoria there is a requirement to comply with legislation relevant to human research involving information privacy (Privacy and Data Protection Act 2014) and health information (Health Records Act 2001).

In addition, consent under circumstances where the Medical Treatment Planning and Decisions Act 2016 and the Mental Health Act 2014 apply, must meet legislative requirements in Victoria. The Laws relating to the provision of consent for persons that do not have decision making capacity to participate in research guidance document outlines the relevant legal requirements in Victoria regarding the provision of consent for an adult who does not have decision-making capacity to participate in human research.

The VSM is completed in ERM as a sub-form of the HREA and is uploaded as a supporting document.

See the Victorian Specific Module (VSM) in ERM guidance document.

For non-ERM user jurisdictions, download the VSM WORD version and submit with the ethics application.

Refer to the Victorian Specific Module guidelines for further information.

The following documents regarding legal information are referred to in the Victorian Specific Module:

Western Australia Specific Module

The Western Australian Specific Module is necessary for both ethics and research governance applications.

The Western Australian Specific Module (WASM) is mandatory if the project has WA site(s). The WASM is available on the WA Research Governance (RGS) website.

For further information refer to the following Projects with a West Australian site guidance document.

Submission of a HREC application

When the HREC application is complete with all supporting documents uploaded, to submit your application see the Signatures requests and Submission for information on electronic signatures and submission process.

Refer to the Applicant user guide to ERM Section 3 & 4 for further information on electronic signatures and submission of Victoria only ethics forms and Section 9 & 10 for Site Specific Assessment forms.

Participant Information and Consent Forms (PICFs)

The InFORMed Participant Information and Consent Form (PICF) is the nationally endorsed approach for developing participant information and consent materials in Australia. It provides a clearer, more consistent and participant centred structure for explaining research studies.

In December 2025, Australian state and territory health departments endorsed the template for use in research reviewed under National Mutual Acceptance (NMA) .

The National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) has also endorsed the template for all human research conducted in Australia or involving Australian participants.

Using the InFORMed PICF template helps to:

present information in a clearer, more accessible way for participants
support consistency across participating sites
reduce administrative duplication for researchers, research offices and ethics committees.

The template is supported by a user guide that helps researchers navigate and understand the key components of this new PICF template.

Safer Care Victoria (SCV) encourages the use of the InFORMed PICF template and user guide for research projects in Victoria.

Victorian specific guidance

Consent from a medical teratment decision maker

A Medical Treatment Decision Maker is the individual legally authorised to make medical treatment decisions on behalf of a person who no longer has decision‑making capacity, in accordance with the Medical Treatment Planning and Decisions Act 2016 (Victoria).

To learn more about when you may need consent from a medical treatment decision maker, visit the Office of the Public Advocate.

If your research project requires consent from a medical treatment decision maker, you can still use the InFORMed PICF template with the following inclusions:

use ‘you’ throughout the PICF to speak directly to the participant, as recommended in the InFORMed user guide.
add the following text to the signature section to explain why the medical treatment decision maker is being asked to sign on behalf of the participant.

Why are you asking me to sign this consent form?

We are asking you to decide about ____________________________ (the participant) taking part in this research project. This is because they cannot decide for themselves and you are their medical treatment decision maker.

By signing this form, you:

confirm that you are the medical treatment decision maker for the participant, and
agree to the participant taking part in this research project

If you would like more information about being a medical treatment decision maker, please contact the Office of the Public Advocate.

Research involving ionising radiation

Ionising radiation in health care

Ionising radiation is a type of high-energy radiation commonly used in healthcare. It includes medical procedures such as:

x-rays
radiotherapy
positron emission tomography (PET) scans
computed tomography (CT) scans
mammography

Code of Practice

The Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA) has a Code of Practice for the Exposure of Humans to Ionizing Radiation for Research Purposes (2005).

The Code explains the responsibilities of researchers, medical physicists, and human research ethics committees (HRECs) in research involving exposure to ionising radiation.

The Code outlines specific responsibilities the participant information and consent form (PICF).

Responsibilities of the researcher

The researcher must:

give the participant (or their parent, guardian or carer if the participant cannot consent) clear written information about the purpose, methods, radiation dose, associated risks and discomforts of the radiation exposure. This will help enable the participant (or their parent, guardian or carer) to give informed consent.
submit this written information to the HREC as part of the ethics application.

Responsibilities of the medical physicist

The medical physicist must:

choose the prescribed statement to include in the PICF based on the effective radiation dose to (refer to annex 2 of the Code)
provide a written report to the researcher and HREC that includes this statement about radiation doses and risks to include in the PICF.

Additional Information

Additional information is available on the Department of Health website including:

the prescribed statements from annex 2 on the ‘standard radiation risk statements’ page
a list of approved medical physicists.

Templates previously used for participant/partner pregnancy and medical treatment decision makers are no longer provided. To request older versions of these templates, email multisite.ethics@safercare.vic.gov.au.